Posts Tagged ‘critic’

Waiting for Feedback – The problem with writing partners

Tuesday, August 18th, 2009

So you slave on writing a draft and hand it over to your writing partners for feedback. The next day I get the thumbs up and thumbs down on a selection of first draft jokes – I’m sure it would have been more in depth but performance and a holiday got in the way for more detailed feedback.  But hey, that’s why we have three of us… oh, she didn’t get the script and is living it up in Bristol.  Damn it!  I need to write.  My fingers are itching and for once I’m not looking up from my laptop towards my Playstation, but up from Playstation towards my laptop.

So here in lies the problem with writing partners. You rely on them.  Sure there are lots of good things about writing with others and I promise I will get to those eventually, maybe even by the end of this blog.  But right now all I need is someone to say “right track there buddy” or “abort abort” and no one is around.

I am alone in the wilderness. My concern (not really a concern, more of a suspicion) is that the first 50% of the script goes nowhere fast.  It is lots of great character stuff, the odd joke and more character stuff.  It is not my fault the substance seems to be missing I used the storylines we slaved over for months and months. You know if this was my script, that I had toiled with for months I would have no problem scrapping huge chunks to drive the story, but damn it, those storylines are there for a reason and I can’t just abandon them.  If I do when they finally read the script they will say…

“but what happened to xyz”.

To which I will reply “oh, you have to kill your darlings.”

To which they will reply, “but xyz”

To which I will reply “You should have a read the damn thing.”

Then we will fist fight till dawn.

The script is now being read, so stress over… at least until I hear the feedback I have been dreading – “right track there buddy” or “abort abort”.

Blames Direct

Friday, August 14th, 2009

This week at the London Comedy Writers Alex Howley returned with another episode of his animated sitcom. This proved to be a unique experience because it was quite obvious that he had taken onboard all the feedback from his last reading at the beginning of the year. So was he successful?

I say it many times, but if you can get a laugh out of room full of writers you are doing good and let’s just say there were plenty of laughs. One of Alex’s strongest attributes is his writing style and his unique voice.  I can point to nothing like it and this is a definite bonus.

A problem with readings is that any stage directions can kill a script.  It is not that they shouldn’t be there, but in a reading they should be looked at to see if they are all really needed.  Alex suffered from this in his last reading and so in this script he weighted it much more heavily on dialogue. The response from the group is that he went too far in that direction and didn’t take advantage of visual opportunities that animation provides.

Last time the plot was all over the place, loads of things going on and tons of characters, so this time Alex focused the script on one simple story and again there was the feeling he went too far in that direction. The lack of a sub plot meant that characters spent too much time discussing what was going rather than doing it (Like in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows) and a favourite character from the last reading was left in the wings.

Another interesting point was the name calling, the running joke in the show got big laughs in the first half but died off in the second. There was debate whether name calling got less funny or we just got bored of the joke. It was decided we got bored of the joke and that it should be used less liberally.

All in all a great night as we set the record for the most “Twats” in a single script (58 in total). Alex being an animator himself has plans to make a pilot at some point in the future.  You can see some of his animation below.

Quote of the night: “I loved the Judge Dredd joke… and that was about it.” (meant as a compliment)

Strictly Business

Friday, July 31st, 2009

Andy Flood presented his script ‘Strictly Business’ this week and by all accounts it was a very successful read. The actors threw their all in and the writers who normally sit with an expression akin to ‘Make me laugh, bitch’ actually did laugh. At the end of the night it was credited as one of the best scripts we have ever had read, but Tristan says that every week… he also says we can’t use brand names and that we will never get the rights to have “We are the Champions” as our opening theme tune.

The Good: First a foremost it was a funny script and the laughs came more often from character rather than ’set-ups and punchlines’. Everyone raved about a scene set in a post credit crunch bank while the bold frankness of a young Tory businessman and a no nonsense teacher provided much merriment. The story was simple, so no one was confused over who was who and what was what.

The bad: This mostly comes from my point of view because I am just more opinionated and hardened from all these readings, but hopefully I am fair. While it was great that the comedy did come character, most laughs came from the 2 one dimensional stereotypes mentioned above. the other 2 character were a little flat in comparison as they were just bullied by these other oppressive oafs. We want to see more of the characters’ wants and needs and why they are with the people they are with. There was a virtually unanimous opinion that the opening was too slow and that we needed to get right into the action (moving the bank scene to the top would not only land a solid comic punch, but also set up the story). Stage directions were too frequent, if one character tells another character to “sit down” I will infer that the character will sit down, I don’t need it in a stage direction. Heavy stage directions in a reading can really kill pace and while this is certainly not the worst offender I have, it certainly didn’t help when actors tried to jump in before a stage direction was read. In the end it was light and enjoyable, but lacked real threat and tension, but there is defiantly an idea there that will be teased out in future drafts.

Finally: Andy burnt through a notebook and 2 pens with notes and while this might sound bad, this is actually good. I find that people have more to say about scripts liked than scripts they hated. With a mercifully small cast (4 main characters and 2 guest spots) this would be easy to film.

Good night.